Wednesday, February 18, 2015

When is a river not a river?

............ when it's a storm drain, I suppose you could say.  That may be a little cynical when applied to Tokyo's river network, but follow the main water courses as they spread through the urban area away from Tokyo Bay and you will see many examples of heavily engineered river banks devoid of vegetation or a natural bank profile.   These rivers seem designed to function almost entirely to channel flood waters through the urban area as quickly as possible.  In many cases, the landscape, ecological and amenity value of these important elements of the city has been almost entirely disregarded and it seems to me that Tokyo has quite literally, turned its back on much of this valuable natural resource.

I thought it would be interesting in this post to take a look at some of these water courses and consider the policies that have brought us to the current situation.  Also, I'd like to think about ways in which planning and urban design might be used to re-connect the population with its river network and begin to restore the historic importance of the water courses to the city of Tokyo.


Historical background:

Historically, Edo, which became known as Tokyo, was a city built on the back of its waterways.  The original settlement upon which the city of Edo was built was a fishing village on the Sumida River.  The name Edo literally means "gateway to the bay." As the great city of Edo grew, it was through the increase in trade that thrived along its network of rivers and canals that stretched inland from the bay.  These water courses became the focus of daily life during the Edo period as they formed the transportation corridors that sustained the city and also, provided areas along their banks for recreation and pleasure.

Originally, much of the land close to Tokyo Bay was a poorly drained marsh and development of the settlement that became the great city of Edo involved a series of drainage projects that gradually expanded the urban area.  Throughout the Edo period, canals were built and formed a fundamental part of the city's infrastructure.  The water courses became a fundamental element in the expansion of trade and growth of the city and residents took pride in their rivers and canals.


Nihonbashi - Edo period
 Following the Meiji restoration in the late 1800's, the rapid industrialisation of Tokyo began and the railways became the main driver in the expansion of the city.  The Great Kanto Earthquake in 1923 devastated the city and the importance of the city's river network became a secondary consideration to the economic imperatives of reconstruction.  Loose planning regulations throughout a large part of the 20th century led to the gradual decline in the environmental quality of the city's water courses.



Planning Policy:

1933  -  Tokyo's Reconstruction Plan:
The amenity value of Tokyo's rivers and canals at this time was not highly valued and many water courses that were not required for either transportation or drainage were filled in to provide for new roads or open spaces.  The remaining network became progressively polluted and disregarded as development turned its back on its rivers.

1964  -  Tokyo Olympics:
In the build up to the Olympics in Tokyo, there was a boom in infrastructure construction and highways became the major priority.  Elevated roadways were built directly above rivers, completely changing their character and environment.  It's difficult to comprehend such drastic policy actions from today's perspective, but at the time, the enablement of rapid economic growth was at the core of planning policy.

1987  -  Tokyo's 2nd Long-term Plan:
By the 1980's there was a change in attitude towards the city's rivers which began to respect their amenity value.  Amongst the key policies within the plan were:-
     -     Promotion of flood control measures
     -     Respect for waterside recreation in flood control projects
     -     Development of a harmonious cityscape, making the most of rivers, lakes, etc.
     -     Renovation of famous bridges in Tokyo

Out of necessity, in the face of the devastation wrought by earthquake and war, Japan has focussed policy towards economic regeneration for much of the 20th century.  As the country emerged as a powerful and prosperous country in the latter part of the century, policy was able to be re-directed to address environmental and public health issues.  The Japanese however, seem to have consistently viewed this as a technological problem, requiring a technological solution, rather than considering the social and aesthetic implications.  As a result, contamination and safety issues seem to have been addressed in isolation of other neglected urban design considerations, such as ecology, amenity and access.

Flood Prevention Policy:

As Tokyo has developed, it has grown into a very high density urban area with vast areas of buildings and hardstanding.  The areas of soft landscaping that would normally allow rainwater to filter down to the water table and naturally drain into the rivers over time are far smaller than in equivalent other big cities.  As a result, the run-off during periods of high rainfall quickly enters the river system and the huge volumes involved create a significant flood risk downstream.

Tokyo's response to this problem has been to create a heavily engineered network of rivers with a built-in capacity to deal with flash storms or periods of prolonged heavy rainfall.  In addition, some innovative new approaches have been developed, including the creation of some vast underground reservoirs that provide storage areas for run-off during peak flooding.    The Metropolitan Area Outer Underground Discharge Channel in Saitama is an incredible structure and is the world's largest underground flood water diversion system.  Huge volumes of water can be stored and gradually pumped back into the river system as water levels begin to fall.  Similarly, a new underground reservoir has been built in Minato, including the area around Roppongi Hills.

Tokyo Metropolitan Area Outer Underground Discharge Channel
首都圏外郭放水路
 shutoken gaikaku hōsuiro

These are impressive engineering feats that go a long way to addressing current flooding risks, but are also representative of an approach that treats the symptoms rather than addressing the causes of the problem.  In many other developed countries, there is an emphasis on slowing the run-off into the river system to avoid the peak flooding problems that occur downstream.  This may be through the creation of flood plains upstream or the adoption of sustainable urban drainage systems (SUDS) in urban areas, which reduce run-off through specially designed porous paved areas.   A more naturalised treatment of river corridors also reduces run-off and avoids some of the peak flooding problems that can occur from flash storms.

Although some SUDS solutions have been introduced in limited areas of Tokyo, the general approach has been to create an efficient storm drainage system from the urban river network.  This has led to a number of issues that have seriously impacted the environmental quality of Tokyo's rivers.

Main Issues affecting Tokyo's Rivers:

Tokyo's rivers have certainly been impacted by the various pressures of urban development, natural and man-made disaster and the practical problems of dealing with flooding.  So, let's look at the main issues which affect landscape and urban quality.

Access:  
Limited planning control has led to development hard up against the river corridors, limiting or preventing public access to the river.
Where access to the river corridor is available, accessibility to the waterside is strictly controlled and footpaths are often narrow and inadequate for dual footpath and cycle use.

Visibility:
Dense urban form often limits visual connectivity between the river and the surrounding urban area.
Dense linear tree planting along river corridor sometimes limits visibility.
Bridges over rivers in some suburban areas often lack openness to allow them to define these key nodal points.

Landscape:
Heavily engineered river banks have created what are no more than concrete channels in many cases with artificial bank profiles devoid of vegetation.
Water levels are often very low in relation to concrete bank heights, adding to the dominant impact of hard surface.
The limited space along the river corridor often allows for no more than a narrow footpath with no space for soft landscaping.
    
Ecology:
Major cities in the 21st Century are beginning to understand that the city is an ecosystem and that its health relies on the health of that ecosystem.  Natural habitats rely on connectivity and a city's river system is often vital to sustain animal and bird populations in urban areas.  Over-engineered river corridors in Tokyo have seriously undermined this.

Activity:
Historically, rivers were a place of activity in Edo times, but to a large extent they have lost this role and the city has turned its back on them.  If they are once again to become a vital part of Tokyo's urban landscape, they need to become "destinations."  They need to be places that people want to visit and have the facilities or environment that will once again attract the city's population.


Some Examples of Tokyo's Water courses

I thought I'd take a look at 3 examples of water courses in different parts of Tokyo that illustrate some of the issues that I've outline above.   

-  Zenpukuji River, Asagaya / Ogikubu  -  a river close to where I live that passes through dense urban areas before opening out into a linear park.

-  Meguro River, Ohashi Junction  -  a river in a heavily built up area and adjacent to a major new highway infrastructure project.  I regularly play futsal on the all-weather pitch inside the oval-shaped enclosed highway structure.

-  Nihonbashi River  -  The river runs through a heavily built up urban area and is characterised by concrete walls and enclosed by a major highway overpass directly over the river.



1.  Zenpukuji River

The Zenpukuji River passes to the south of Ogikubo and Asagaya in Suginami Ward and over a distance of several kilometres it runs through a linear park called Zenpukuji Gawa Ryokuchi.  I've lived close to this park for a number of years and it provides a great facility for local people to jog, cycle or just use the open space for play and picnics.  The park has a number of play areas and cherry trees line the river, making it a popular destination for "hanami" (cherry blossom watching) in Springtime.

Whilst the park itself is an excellent facility with plenty of access points, I remember when I first visited the park, being struck by the sterile stone and concrete channel that forms the river and how the river itself seemed at odds with the green surroundings of the park.  The water level generally lies 4 or 5 meters below the adjacent footpath and I can honestly say I've never seen the river level rise beyond about a metre or so, even after very heavy rainfall.

Upstream from the linear park towards Ogikubo, the surrounding urban area squeezes the river into a narrow area that provides only room for a small footpath either side of the river with adjacent housing hard up against the footpath edge.  Here, there is little vegetation to soften the impact of the vertical concrete edges of the river channel.


The key issues that need to be addressed are:-
-  Allow access to the actual waterside, where space permits.
-  Introduce vegetation into the river channel to soften the hard engineered edges.
-  Provide an ecological corridor for wildlife.
-  Create markers to identify bridge crossings, eg. surface changes, signage, bridge design 






View 1:
Vertical concrete walls line the edge of the river corridor at this point.  The river is relatively wide but the encroachment of housing on either side allows for only a narrow footpath.  Remediation works could include:-





-  Gabion baskets to create a low retaining wall within the river channel.

-  Waterside planting to break up the expanse of concrete wall and attract wildlife.


View 2:
The river passes through the linear park at this point and generous footpaths follow the top of the river banks on either side.  The river corridor has an engineered v-section stone clad profile and narrow walkways alongside the water's edge.  No access to these walkways exists.  
Improvement works could include:-





-  Create access to water's edge footway.

-  Provide informal and robust seating along the river's edge.

-  Allow ground cover planting to spill over v-shaped channel to soften hard surfaces and visually integrate with surroundings.





2.  Meguro River

This stretch of the Meguro River passes next to a large and recently completed infrastructure project at O-hashi junction.  A huge concrete oval has been created with traffic entering a tunnel built within the structure and connecting with the overpass that runs through Ikejiriohashi.  Inside the oval there's an all-weather futsal pitch that I'm a regular visitor to and on the top of the oval is an elevated park, known as "Meguro Sky Garden, rising from 15 to 35m above the surrounding street level." 

Clearly, a lot of money has been spent in creating the landscape and sports facilities that have resulted from the highway infrastructure project and the "Sky Garden" is an innovative and well-delivered new urban space.  Innevitably though, there is a physical disconnect between the park and the surrounding urban environment and unless you already know of its existence, you be hard pushed to find it.  Given the scale of the overall project and the opportunity this provided, I can't help feeling that an opportunity was missed to make a real impact at street level and to integrate the river into the scheme.

View 1
View 2






By creating an active frontage along the perimeter of the Oval, a real destination can evolve, providing day time and night time activities.

A pedestrian-priority zone up to the river's edge would help to integrate the river into the surrounding urban space.  Informal seating along the riverside under the cherry trees would draw activity towards the river and access could be provided to the water's edge below.

Introducing heavy loose stones along base of the river channel would create a more natural setting for the water course and reduce the overbearing scale of the concrete channel.







3.  Nihonbashi River:


The Nihonbashi bridge lies at the historical commercial centre of the city and its significance dates back well into the Edo period, often being represented in the ukiyoe pictures of Edo life.  With this in mind, it seems even more incredible that the scene is now totally dominated by a huge series of highway overpasses, stretching over the bridge and following the course of the river.  If ever there was a symbol of the impact of unplanned urban development in Tokyo, then this is probably it.

The massive steel members of the overpass, arching over the river has a hugely negative impact on the setting of the bridge.  The adjacent commercial buildings lie hard against the river edge along this stretch of the waterway so there is no opportunity for riverside walks.  A river ferry does however, leave from a floating wharf below Nihonbashi bridge and is accessible from the street above.

Having acknowledged all of the above, there is something uniquely dramatic about the space under the overpass.  Great pillars support the curves of the highway structure creating a powerful sense of enclosure.  We can safely assume that the overpasses are here to stay for the foreseeable future, so what can be achieved from this situation?



Opportunities:


Floating Market  -  
The central location of Nihonbashi makes it feasible to establish some kind of market alongside the river.  Access to the river ferry terminal already exists and the wharf could be extended to enable a regular market or entertainment destination to be created.  This would introduce something unique to the city centre and would transform the relationship between the river and the surrounding urban area.

Art Installation  -  
The unusual setting of the river and the visual impact of the overpasses calls for some imaginative new interpretation of the space.  A bold art installation has the potential to create a new sense of place in what has become an urban back water.  The highway structure provides the means to suspend or attach an installation that could make a major impact.  The use of movement, light, wind or sound could create a new and animated landmark.   

Lighting  -  
The dramatic forms of the highway overpass and columns have the potential to come alive at night through lighting.  This is probably the most practical and cost effective opportunity to change perceptions of the urban environment in this part of the city and may become the catalyst for a closer relationship between the city's inhabitants and the river.


The above examples of Tokyo's river network represent just a fraction of the waterways that pass through the city.  Whilst, it seems that there is now a common recognition of the importance of this resource to the city, decades of neglect will not be overturned easily.  There are huge practical issues that stand in the way of meaningful change, but perhaps, with the approaching 2020 Olympics, there will now be a political will to make a difference.  Let us hope that this will be the catalyst for real change.


Wednesday, December 3, 2014

The historical development of Edo (Tokyo)

Before I get into the way Tokyo is now, I thought for my own information and anyone else who's interested, I'd take a look at the history of Tokyo and how the city has developed historically.

The Tokugawa Shogunate
The settlement that has become Tokyo arose around 400 years ago during the early part of the Tokugawa shogunate, that ruled Japan from 1603 to 1868.  The Shogun set up his power base in Edo castle, on the site of the current imperial palace in the heart of Tokyo.  Whilst the Emperor remained in Kyoto as a figure head, the country was ruled by the shogunate in Edo which became the political and cultural centre of Japan.  By the mid 18th century, Edo had become a city of 1 million inhabitants.

The original plan for Edo was based around the castle, which was positioned at the edge of an elevated area known as the Musashino plateau.  In contrast to many European cities of this time, the city developed along a far less rigid structure.  Although broadly based on a grid layout, development tended to respect the natural topography and as a result, took on a more organic form.  On the upper land to the north, west and south of the castle, the estates of the Daimyo (feudal lords) were located.  This area was known as Yamanote and the name is now used for the rail line that circulates around central Tokyo.  The Daimyo estates provided fine residences for the ruling Samurai classes and took advantage of the surrounding countryside to create views that maintained a strong connection with the natural landscape.  Many of the Daimyo estates created Kaiyuushiki teien, or stroll gardens, some of which remain to this day as the idealistic informal gardens for which Japan is famous.
Koshikawa Korakuen, Tokyo (Stroll Garden)


In contrast to the estates of the ruling class, the Choumin, or townsfolk, resided in the lower area to the east of the castle, and which became known as Shitamachi (literally "below town").  The area developed along the rivers that fed into the bay and formed the transportation network for the early city.  As a result, trade flourished in these areas and a dense and vibrant settlement quickly spread along these transportation corridors.  Shitamachi was generally the area to the east of the Sumida River.

Shitamachi was originally laid out on a grid pattern, based on blocks of 120m x 120m.  These areas in turn were divided into 9 inner blocks of 40m x 40m and these formed the basic urban structure.  A merchant would generally build their house on the outer edge of the these blocks and this would typically serve as a place of business or a shop too.  Behind the house, the landowner would build lower quality housing that could be rented out to less affluent townspeople and faced onto a narrow alley.  In this way, a dense built form within a network of narrow alleys developed and became the backdrop for much of Edo life.  Although cramped and lacking open views, these areas were served by common water supplies and latrines. 


"Yamanote" areas in Red / "Shitamchi" areas in Blue

The urban development of Edo was frequently interrupted by fires and natural disasters, some of which were devastating in terms of their impact.  The Great Fire of Meireki in 1657 destroyed upto 70% of the city and led to the re-planning of the city, including fire breaks and look-outs.  The common open areas that acted as fire breaks also became activity spaces and a focal point for entertainment in the city.  The areas were known as Sakariba.

Administration of the city was traditionally controlled through a series of districts, rather than a central body.  These districts in turn passed down control of separate town areas to smaller administrative bodies and in this way, governance and development became highly localised.

The Meiji Period
The Edo period lasted until 1868 when the Meiji Restoration reinstated the Emperor as the head of the political system and the Emperor Meiji moved from Kyoto to Edo.  At this time, the city was re-named Tokyo and this became the new capital of Japan.  The Meiji period, lasted from 1868 to 1912 and saw the emergence of Japan as a modern nation and the country rapidly industrialised.  Western-style architecture was introduced for many public buildings and modern road and rail infrastructure began to become established.

The modernisation of Japan also led to new ideas on urban planning and the government introduced the 50 ward system in 1869-71.  Whilst maintaining much of the local powers of administration, this enabled city-wide standards of infrastructure to be introduced and the planning of city parks and recreation spaces.  The city population increased rapidly from around 850,000 in 1882 to about 2 million by 1905.

The Great Kanto Earthquake (1923)
In 1923, the city was once again struck by natural disaster as the Great Kanto Earthquake laid waste to much of the city and with terrible loss of life.  An earthquake measuring 8.3 on the Richter scale struck 80Km south of Tokyo at noon on 1st September.  With many people cooking lunch at the time, numerous fires spread rapidly, made worse by a typhoon that hit simultaneously.  A tsunami caused devastation along the coastal areas in and around Tokyo Bay and a total of 100,000 people died with tens of thousands more missing.

In the aftermath of the quake, it was even suggested that the capital city be moved from Tokyo but in the end, plans were made for the city reconstruction.  Modern road networks and public parks were planned as well as new standards for construction of public buildings.    Designated building lines were introduced in 1938 to try to control unrestricted development in areas with insufficient infrastructure, but these defined the building line as up to any road of 4m or wider.  This simply led to dense suburban growth based around an inadequate network of narrow highways. In the end, many of the city plans remained unfunded with the on-set of the 2nd World War.

World War II
The first bombing of tokyo was in 1942 but consistent bombing of the capital began in November 1944 when US troops had occupied islands close enough to Tokyo.  The terrible devastation reached its peak on 9th/10th March 1945 when the fire-bombing of Tokyo caused an inferno so intense that it destroyed 45 sq.Km of the city and killed 100,000 people in a single night.  Tokyo's population was around 7.4 million during the war and more than half fled the city in the face of the bombing campaign, only returning after the Japanese surrender on August 15th 1945.

Following the war, the government's priority was economic growth and re-building a country that could feed and house its population.  As a result, the city re-built itself under a continued weak planning system.  Whilst the government provided the major infrastructure, the actual re-building of housing was left very much to the population, with few restrictions.  Later, as the country got back on its feet, much of the suburban development was dictated by the rail companies who bought up land alongside their expanding rail lines and built housing areas and retail hubs around the stations.  By selling the housing they were able to finance further rail expansion and extend the reach of the metropolis and its ever-expanding population.

Economic re-emergence of Japan
Post-war, Japan remained a largely agricultural country, but gradually, the country developed its modern industry and attracted by higher wages and education, more and more of the rural population migrated to Tokyo.  To accommodate this influx, by the 1960's, Public Corporations started to build public housing schemes, or Danchi on the former agricultural land on the outskirts of the city.  Many of these were provided with new schools and landscaped parks and were close to rail infrastructure.  New towns, like Tama New Town and Chiba New Town were developed as more ambitious urban centres within the outer suburbs of the metropolis.

Finally, in 1968, new Planning Laws were introduced which controlled the extent of spread of the city, provided some zoning of areas to protect sensitive residential areas and introduced a permission system for new development.  The 1970's saw an increase in popularity of the condominium, or mansion, and the inner city areas took on a more diverse urban form, although remained largely low-rise.

During the 1980s, the boom economy was under way and Tokyo saw the arrival of many landmark city developments as it took its place amongst the world's most advanced cities.  Land prices sky rocketed and by the end of the decade, inner city areas were some of the most expensive in the world, leading to a fall in the population of some inner city areas.  The effects of the end of the bubble economy and the "bad loans" associated with property development are still being felt today, but the continual cycle of re-building continues.  The average life of a building in Tokyo is around 15 years.

Inheritance tax in Japan is quite onerous compared to many other countries and, combined with the high land costs, this leads to the gradual division of land plots as houses pass from one generation to the next.  What were once large plots in the suburbs have become sub-divided into smaller and smaller areas leading to a progressive increase in housing density in many areas.  Alternatively, some owners have built small condominiums on former housing plots to maximise development value.

In the 1990s and beyond, former industrial land along the water front of Tokyo Bay became available as companies moved production to cheaper overseas locations.  Some of these areas have been restored and redeveloped with high-rise residential towers which has seen a return of communities to this part of the city.

The legacies of Tokyo's historic development
Tokyo is a city that has had to deal with disasters on a monumental scale, but has somehow found a way to re-create itself.  To a large extent this has not relied on strict planning or any clear vision of what the city was to become, but rather it has been down to the will and fortitude of its people.  So where does this leave us in terms of the city today?  Well, simply based on my own impressions, I've set out some of the positive and negative aspects of the city as I see them.

Positives:
-    It's a safe place to live
-    The city works efficiently, particularly the transport system
-    The high population density sustains many local shops and facilities
-    Major retail is closely linked to rail stations making it accessible from public transport 
-    Mixed-use neighbourhoods create a more vibrant and active community
-    Diverse housing mixes allow for more social diversity in neighbourhoods
-    Use of elevated walkways and subways to allow pedestrian movement from rail hubs

Negatives:
-    Urban sprawl blurs boundaries between settlements
-    Lack of visual landmarks or spatial diversity causes disorientation
-    Narrow streets bring cars and pedestrians into conflict
-    Apparent lack of distinctive character areas
-    No clear vernacular in residential architecture
-    Incoherent boundary treatments to housing
-    Overhead cables create visual distraction
-    Over-engineered treatment to urban water courses
-    Huge concrete overpasses dominate some parts of the city
-    Insufficient capacity of major roads into and out of Tokyo

I hope to look into some of these aspects later on in my blog, but for now, that'll do.

Andy





Introduction to this Blog

Welcome to this blog about the city of Tokyo.  


View of Shinjuku towards Mt. Fuji
The metropolitan area of Tokyo makes up the most populated urban settlement in the World and for most of those who have never visited the city, the image that probably comes to mind is of white-gloved officials cramming salarymen into bursting train carriages as they head once more to their daily grind.  Yet, talk to anyone who has come to live here and they will probably tell you that it's an amazingly easy, and dare I say, comfortable place to live.  

Visiting the central hubs of the city, it's easy to see Tokyo as a modern and efficient high-rise metropolis.  However, venture a little further from these hot-spots, and you soon realise that much of the city is a low-rise sprawl of houses, apartments and a myriad of small shops and businesses.  There seems to have been an almost laissez faire attitude to the development of many of these areas and it makes it even more amazing that the Japanese have found a way to make their city function so effectively.  


Kabukicho comes alive
It is this apparent lack of urban spatial planning in many areas of the city that lead me to the title of the blog, "Tokyo - The Accidental City."  It is almost as though development here has been allowed to take its own course through the needs and demands of its population, rather than from some guiding hand or vision for the city.  The result can't claim to be one of the world's most beautiful cities, in the usual sense, but it is certainly a city of great vitality and energy.  Tokyo is the true 24 hour city and many areas only really come alive as the sun sets.  Mundane streets are transformed by neon illuminations into an after hours play ground of restaurants, bars, karaoke and pachinko parlours.  Even the regular shopping streets are a hive of activity as commuters collect their daily shopping on their way from the train stations, often past 9 or 10pm.

Whilst I genuinely admit to enjoy living in this unique city, there are many things that I see and experience every day that leave me perplexed and scratching my head at the paradoxical nature of the Japanese and their relationship with their environment.  In this blog I want to look at different aspects of the Tokyo urban landscape and try to give some kind of explanation for why things are the way they are and perhaps point to ways in which they could be improved.  As a landscape architect, I suppose I'm likely to focus more on the visual and aesthetic elements and the public areas of the built environment, but I do hope to also look at architecture and urban planning in a broader sense.


Please feel free to add comments and perhaps suggestions for future posts.


Andy